![]() |
|||
|
Soil and Landscape Science
Surface Water Hydrology
Groundwater Hydrology
Environmental Information Systems
Environmental Earth Observation
Catchment Biogeochemistry and Aquatic Ecology
Contaminant Chemistry and Ecotoxicology
Water Reuse and Environmental Process Engineering
Urban Water Systems Engineering
|
![]() Using Hydrology to Target SalinityUsing Groundwater Flow Systems (GFS) and top-down hydrological approaches to target salinity mitigation measures in the Murray-Darling Basin
Understanding groundwater flow systems is critical to salinity management as the Australian landscape is highly variable - and what works in one area may not work for another. Recognising this, the project team started developing maps of groundwater flow systems in the Murray-Darling Basin (MDB), highlighting differences and pinpointing where they occur in the landscape. A series of case studies followed, providing ‘real world examples’ of how to plan salinity management actions with an awareness of the underlying hydrology. Models have now been developed to assist in this planning process, so that regional groups and catchment managers can look at maps and then ‘play’ with different management actions, with an appreciation of what the trade-offs might be. The researchers were also keen to identify other (potentially unforeseen) impacts of salinity management actions and land use change such as revegetation or large-scale forestry plantation. Impacts can extend to water resources and catchment water yield. Tools such as BC2C allow both resource issues to be considered at the same time. Most of the catchment groups in the Eastern MDB are already using the maps and models as part of the planning process. ObjectivesD2013: To predict the regional scale impacts of afforestation and other land use changes on mean annual and seasonal catchment water yield, groundwater recharge, and stream salinity. D9004: To produce a framework and suitable outputs to ensure that funding and resources for salinity management is targeted towards appropriate management activities. The research effort that has gone towards meeting these objectives can be broken down into four distinct areas:
Key Outputs
StaffGlen Walker, Lu Zhang, Mat Gilfedder, Warrick Dawes, Trevor Dowling, Jenet Austin, Alice Best, Klaus Hickel, Matthew Stenson CollaboratorsRay Evans (Salient Solutions), Phil Dyson (Dyson and Associates), Peter Hekmeijer (DPI), Greg Summerell (DIPNR), Peter Baker (Bureau of Rural Sciences |
||
|
Copyright | Legal Notice and Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Website Information Last updated: 28 January, 2011 |
|||